スタッフブログ

Indicate and you may simple deviation regarding gamete breeding values

2022.08.06

Indicate and you may simple deviation regarding gamete breeding values

Correlations between traits were analyzed for MGBV and SDGBV to investigate relationships between traits. To study whether selection, which should result in increased inbreeding and homozygosity per generation, had an antagonistic effect on MGBV and SDGBV, correlations of SDGBV and MGBV with the genomic (FG) and the pedigree (FP) jak smazat účet cuddli inbreeding coefficients were computed for each trait. Furthermore, MGBV and SDGBV were tested for normality.

Recognition

Consequence of the fresh simulation was basically confirmed of the rebuilding the newest paternally transmitted haplotype for each and every animal. Then the paternally transmitted haplotype breeding worth try projected, by the summing the fresh paternally sent haplotype, that this situation means haploid chromosomes, having 50 % of the fresh estimated SNP effects. An allergy research try did to determine the sized the fresh new progeny teams for every sire required for recognition. The fresh new noticed imply and fundamental deviation of your projected breeding values of one’s girls and boys were compared to the latest indicate and you can important deviation taken from the newest simulation and correlations was indeed calculated.

Mating plan

Subsequent to the prediction off MGBV and you may SDGBV, specific matings was in fact designed using newly arranged mating application, that also boasts creature ownership suggestions and you can pedigree data. The fresh new questioned imply reproduction worth of a possible offspring are calculated as:

where mBV is the expected breeding value of an offspring based on the parental average estimated breeding values, MGBVs is the estimated mean gamete breeding value of the sire, and MGBVd is the estimated mean gamete breeding value of the dam.

where sBV is the expected standard deviation of breeding values within the potential offspring of the same mating, SDGBVs is the standard deviation of gamete breeding values of the sire, and SDGBVd is the standard deviation of gamete breeding values of the dam.

Results

Figure 2 shows for each trait and animal the relation between MGBV and SDGBV. Average MGBV were equal to 0.36 genetic standard deviation (?a) for fat yield, 0.54 ?an excellent, for protein yield, 0.22 ?a for somatic cell score, and 0.09 ?a for the direct genetic effect for stillbirth. A mean SDGBV of 0.47 ?a was obtained for somatic cell score. The direct genetic effect for stillbirth had an average SDGBV of 0.25 ?a. All plots show the presence of animals with equal MGBV but significantly different SDGBV. For example, for protein yield, bulls with an MGBV of 1.8 ?a showed a maximum difference in SDGBV of 0.22 ?a.

Relationship between MGBV and you may SDGBV. Attributes investigated were fat give, healthy protein give, somatic telephone get additionally the direct genetic impression having stillbirth. The fresh reddish traces mean opportinity for MGBV and you may SDGBV. For each mark means an animal.

Table 1 contains the observed correlations between the MGBV for the four traits, the genomic (FG) and the pedigree (FP) inbreeding coefficients. The correlation between MGBV was 0.66 for fat yield with protein yield and 0.15 for somatic cell score with the direct genetic effect for stillbirth. Correlation of SDGBV was lower with FG than with FP.

Correlations among SDGBV for the four traits are in Table 2. These correlations were lower than correlations among MGBV. Correlation between SDGBV was highest for fat yield with protein yield (0.41). Correlations between SDGBV for the other traits ranged from 0.05 to 0.13. For all traits, correlations between SDGBV and FP were negative. Correlations between SDGBV and FG were also negative for all traits and two to four times larger than correlations between SDGBV and FP.

The MGBV showed no difference between theoretical and sampled quintiles of the normal distribution function for any of the studied traits (results not shown). Figure 3 shows Q-Q plots for SDGBV for the four traits. The graphs indicate that the classes in the middle of the distribution were almost normally distributed for all traits. For the more extreme classes, especially for animals with a SDGBV for fat yield lower than 0.35 ?a, a substantial deviation from the normal distribution was observed.